Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example, working for a charity, improving the neighborhood, or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people provide free services while educational programs are run to verify working for a charity. What is the best way to cope with organizing events without accepting payment? I agree to back up my points with examples in this essay.
To start with, a group of people is disseminating information to benefit society. Two benefits of communication and self-assurance in moving other behaviors to understand anywhere. For instance, there are several old-age homes in my nation that require assistance without charge. A large corporation gives a charity a significant check or amount of cash. Additionally, the service is mostly offered in daily life due to the continuation of many programs in secondary schools.
Second, it’s necessary for community services to become mandatory with the payment of various clients for a paid job. In different countries, some of the highest-paid work is outside of a cultural context. For example, making the neighborhood a better place for younger kids depends on their current circumstances. The youth are willing to attend cinema-style entertainment since they desire more money to experience life’s events. A growing number of relatives are making sports instruction for adolescents a requirement for their schooling. Many students begin working in juvenile facilities when they are 18 years old, where they are often in dire need.
In essence, despite the widespread misconception that secondary school programs do not pay for services, I think self-respect and assurance are important for a charity. I believe that people in the neighborhood are interacting more with young people.