Positive or Negative Development

Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Do you think this is positive or negative development?

Model Solution

There has been a substantial increase in the number of individuals who spend significant money on sporting and cultural events. Some argue that this trend represents a positive development, while others argue that it represents a negative development. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and offer my opinion.

On the one hand, many argue that spending money on cultural and sporting events is a positive trend. First, it offers the chance to observe and appreciate diverse cultures and art forms. Participating in cultural events, such as concerts or exhibitions, can expand one’s horizons and deepen one’s understanding of the world. Second, sporting events promote physical fitness and health by encouraging individuals to participate in physical activities. In addition, sports events can foster a sense of community by bringing people together to cheer for their favourite teams or players, fostering a sense of belonging.

On the other hand, some believe spending a lot of money on sporting or cultural event tickets is a negative trend. First, it can cause financial hardship, particularly for those who cannot afford it. Secondly, it may encourage excessive consumerism, as individuals may purchase tickets without considering their actual needs and desires. This may result in an unsustainable lifestyle and contribute to environmental problems. Attending such events may not be a productive use of time and may distract from more meaningful pursuits such as studying, working, or spending quality time with loved ones.

In my opinion, attending sporting and cultural events can be positive and negative, depending on the circumstances. Although they can provide a platform for learning about different cultures and art forms, it is essential to consider the financial implications of such expenditures. In addition, it is necessary to strike a balance between leisure activities and other productive endeavours.

In conclusion, attendance at sporting and cultural events can promote physical fitness, cultural awareness, and community building in certain circumstances. However, it is essential to consider the financial ramifications and the need to prioritise productive activities.

Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?

Sample Solution

It’s claimed that technology has recently altered how men and women interact with one another. Due to a reduction in face-to-face interaction, people are less able to spend time with their loved ones, which is detrimental to relationships.

Nowadays, most interactions between people take place online, which decreases face-to-face interactions. In other words, people have become so dependent on social media that they have forgotten about their family and friends. As a result, rather than engaging in face-to-face conversation, they are more interested in online relationships. For instance, a study conducted by the Times of India in 2014 revealed that the usage of modern technology in the last 10 years has resulted in a 30% decline in face-to-face engagement between people.

Because they are always occupied with their online pals and spend the majority of their time on mobile devices and social networking websites, people rarely spend time with their families. This means that people used to spend their free time with their families and participate in family events in the past, but that trend has altered as a consequence of technological advancements. As a result of the weakening of family bonds, it has turned into a negative development. For instance, a recent survey by the New York Times found that 70% of people spend their leisure time on their phones, while the remaining 30% spend it with their families.

In conclusion, technology has had a negative impact on relationships since It decreases face-to-face communication. and prevents people from spending enough time with their families.

In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important. Why might this be the case? Is this a positive or negative development?

Sample Solution

In some countries, people value home ownership significantly more than they value apartment renting. Living in a self-owned property delivers safety, comfort, and achievement. In my opinion, whether it is a favorable or negative position depends on several aspects.

The need for house ownership among many people is the main factor influencing people’s preference for buying a home over renting one. For instance, when people start their careers, especially in Thailand, their first priority is to save money in order to purchase a home because owning a home is a crucial component of raising a stable family. Additionally, not having to search for housing may free up time for people to concentrate on other facets of their lives, such as their careers and families.

It depends on the individual’s circumstances, in my opinion, whether having a property is a favourable or negative condition. For those who, for instance, can afford to purchase a large home and have few financial obligations, their home is an asset, and owning a home is advantageous for them. On the other side, some people with little income may find it detrimental to own a place to live since they lack the resources to do so and cannot afford an apartment or a house. As a result, they would take out a sizable loan and ultimately repay the money over a very lengthy period of time. As a result, they must now pay more interest.

To sum up, I believe that if done within a budget, home ownership may be a rewarding experience. However, it could go wrong if someone takes out a loan to buy a house that is far beyond their ability to pay it back.

Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Sample Solution

As the internet develops, globalization is quickly transforming our world. Since people can now buy similar things from anywhere in the world, the similarities between nations are even more pronounced. This essay will argue that it is a lousy development by examining the adverse effects globalization has on the many civilizations worldwide and our environment.

Since individuals are replacing their conventional behaviors with new ones that originate from economically dominating nations like North America and Europe, easy access to goods from other parts of the world is undermining cultural unities and identities. For instance, a recent study reveals that people in my country listen to international songs more often than Brazilian ones, and even the national songs have added parts of North American music for success. As a result, the characteristics of our traditional music, which is a pleasure to our culture, are vanishing quickly.

Furthermore, because consumers frequently purchase online as opposed to from local businesses, the environment is yet another consequence of globalization. They maximize the number of shipments by doing this. For instance, due to its significant release of carbon dioxide into our atmosphere, the shipping sector was ranked as the third most polluting industry in the world last year. As a result, it adds to the acceleration of global warming, which is of great concern to societies all over the world.

In conclusion, it is obvious that globalization is bad for nations since it destroys cultures and harms the environment. In order to make more informed purchases, people need to be aware of these facts. Today, in addition to casting votes in elections, people can also influence the future of countries through what they buy.

In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Sample Solution

Business owners frequently state in their marketing today that their items are new in certain ways. They do this primarily to get the attention of their clients. This phenomenon, in my opinion, should be viewed as a bad development because people will typically focus on new products and forget many traditionally important objects.

It is a marketing tactic used to entice more clients, which is the main reason why so many new inventions are highlighted in the advertising. In other words, a brand constantly intrigues people when new products with new features are introduced. Along with a certain product becoming well-liked, a brand’s other products also gain popularity. A food manufacturer, Diamon Grains, claims that this is obvious because other varieties of snacks sold under its name gain more popularity when new flavors of snacks are launched.

Nevertheless, it should be seen as a bad development when advertisements for products highlight new features. This is due to the fact that original products will eventually be replaced by the most recently developed goods, meaning that they won’t be around to be seen. As a result, cultures lost a number of priceless items. For instance, it can be challenging to find authentic Thai desserts in Bangkok. Italian pudding, chocolate cake, and boba tea, on the other hand, are very popular.’

In order to capture consumers’ attention, several businesses are attempting to represent new characteristics of their products. This activity has the potential to destroy cultural goods in a disastrous way. Therefore, I think that this is unquestionably a bad development.

Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Sample Solution

Many people have a tendency to consume medications today without receiving a correct diagnosis from a doctor. This, in my opinion, is a bad development because it will have a variety of detrimental effects on a person’s life. The essay’s subsequent paragraphs will examine two elements that helped shape my viewpoint.

First off, taking the medication without a prescription can make an existing problem worse or will increase the risk of developing a serious disease. Humans should not take medications in accordance with what they have read or heard in a newspaper article or on the internet. Due to what they have learned in school, doctors are knowledgeable about the best treatments for various disorders. Therefore, it is wise to see a doctor before ingesting any substances because they may affect your body differently. For instance, a growing number of new cases brought to the hospital in Anuradhapura are being brought on by using illegal narcotics, according to a recent report in the Sunday Times.

In addition to the aforementioned risks, abusing illegal drugs can result in death. For instance, if people look back at the mainstream media over the past few years, they can find numerous examples of how unprescribed drugs have killed individuals all over the world. Additionally, if they had contacted the appropriate personnel prior to taking those drugs, several diseases would have been curable. Therefore, consulting a doctor before taking medication on your own is recommended.

I’ll emphasize that seeking therapy on your own is a bad idea because it will result in serious disease, and occasionally even death. So, before receiving care based on word of mouth, everyone should behave responsibly.

Finally, I want to stress that seeking care on your own is a bad idea because it will result in serious sickness, and occasionally even death. Therefore, before seeking medical attention based solely on word of mouth, everyone should behave responsibly.

Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Sample Solution

The youth now spend the majority of their waking hours on their smartphones thanks to the advancement of technology and the internet. This phenomenon is the result of several factors, which will be discussed in more detail in this essay. I also argue that this development harms children.

To start, a variety of variables influence why kids spend so much time on technology. One of them would be the amusement offered by social media, which drives people to scroll continuously on the digital platform. For example, a recent study I read demonstrates that social media platforms are created to boost users’ intake of the content uploaded online, which explains why most kids cannot put down their phones. Additionally, parents give their children cell phones from a young age to fill their free time rather than encouraging them to go outside. Therefore, each of these causes has an impact on the current situation.

First off, because kids are exposed to these modern devices at a young age, this development typically results in addiction. Second, youngsters who spend their days on their phones frequently experience detrimental effects on their academic performance, becoming less focused and motivated to learn. For instance, my sister became addicted to her smartphone after receiving it when she was just 10 years old, which caused a major decline in her academic performance. As a result, technology should be used responsibly.

In conclusion, adults unaware of the potential harm to children often cause severe phenomena like this one, and I think that social media use before the age of 18 should be limited to prevent further harm.

Weddings are getting bigger and more expensive. What is the reason for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

Model Solution

Compared to the past, modern wedding rituals include a substantial amount of money and many guests. The tendency of people to flaunt themselves is, in my opinion, one of the primary causes of this trend. This essay aims to illustrate why over-budgeted and larger wedding celebrations cause more damage than good.

Nowadays, people spend a lot of money. Spending a lot of money and inviting many guests to a wedding is mostly to show off. This is because many individuals feel that bragging about their money by overpaying for such events will get social recognition. People in Punjab, for instance, prefer to rent wedding palaces, which are often costly, rather than organise weddings in their houses. Moreover, the higher the anticipated attendance, the larger the food and seating arrangements. Thus, sending invites to all connections to increase the size of wedding events is not a good idea, as it will raise the whole expenditure.

In my opinion, the trend toward larger and more expensive weddings is detrimental. Due to their inability to spend big sums of money on weddings, individuals from middle-class households may feel inferior to those from rich families. As a result, they favour taking out loans for these purposes and spending a significant amount of time paying them back. The money squandered on weddings might be used for other reasons, such as charitable contributions to schools and orphanages. In this approach, individuals will not only give to a worthy cause but also feel gratified by helping the disadvantaged. Therefore, smaller weddings with fewer budgets are preferable.

In conclusion, I believe that flaunting one’s wealth and influence is a waste of money since it may foster feelings of inferiority among the poor. In addition, if individuals donate that money to charity, the world will become a better place for those who truly need it.