Agree Disagree Essays

Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay Solution on the Future of Newspapers

With the advancement of technology, the internet has become an integral component of our daily lives, including our news consumption. Some contend that newspapers will continue to be the most important source of news, despite the growing popularity of online news reading. In this essay, I will argue that, despite the growing popularity of the internet as a news source, newspapers continue to play a crucial role in providing reliable and trustworthy news.

On the one hand, it is indisputable that the internet has altered how we consume news. People have greater access to news than ever before due to the proliferation of social media, news websites, and mobile applications. This has led to a shift towards digital news consumption, with many people preferring to read the news on their smartphones or computers. Moreover, the Internet enables instantaneous news delivery, making it a convenient and efficient way to keep up with current events.

However, newspapers remain an essential source of news for various reasons. Initially, newspapers have a long history of providing credible and dependable journalism. Professional journalists are employed by newspapers and are trained to gather and report the news without bias or sensationalism. This ensures that readers can trust the news they are reading, which is crucial in an era where misinformation and fake news are prevalent on the internet. Second, newspapers offer a more comprehensive analysis of current events than the internet. In contrast to online news, which frequently provides brief summaries of events, newspapers have the space to provide detailed analysis, opinion pieces, and in-depth features on a variety of subjects. This enables readers to acquire a more nuanced comprehension of complex issues.

In conclusion, while the Internet has undoubtedly altered how we consume news, newspapers will continue to be the primary news source. Newspapers provide reliable and trustworthy journalism, in-depth analysis and features, whereas the Internet provides instant and convenient news access. Therefore, newspapers will continue to play a crucial role in informing and educating the public, and their importance in the digital age should not be underestimated.

When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try to keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Sample Solution

Nowadays, a country’s traditional abilities and ways of life are significantly impacted by technological innovation and its quick global spread. Some claim that such an influence would render standard skills and lives obsolete since it is so remarkable. However, I think they would persist as long as they offered fresh ideas for contemporary technologies and alternatives to contemporary lifestyles.

One factor is that conventional practices have lost their relevance and don’t meet modern requirements. For instance, traditional practises like being married at the age of 15 and having your teeth dyed black was once common in Vietnam’s mountainous regions, but these practises have since been abandoned and are now meaningless. Additionally, as homes on stilts are not as durable as concrete homes, homes in the mountains are gradually being replaced with concrete homes. Furthermore, conventional skills cannot enhance the image because we now promote the modern 4.0 image, which is quick and convenient rather than cumbersome and slow as in the past. For instance, abilities like ploughing and harrowing are no longer appropriate for international dissemination to enhance the national image.

Traditional skills also impact work productivity, which gradually loses its value. For instance, instead of harvesting rice by hand in the fields, people now use modern harvesting equipment, which is more time-consuming and does not produce the desired yield. Traditional techniques also fall short of modern technologies in terms of speed and accuracy. For instance, educational software on computers will be used instead of handwriting in order to track the number of students and manage them effectively.

To sum up, traditional knowledge and ways of living are increasingly being seen as valuable alternatives to the homogeneity that comes with the widespread use of contemporary technologies. Although certain technologies would eventually become outdated as a result of the selection process involved in technological advancement, there is no doubt that some would thrive when their responsibilities were recognized.

Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential for easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Sample IELTS Essay on Sports Events

Global sporting events draw participants from various nations, allowing them to showcase their abilities. Many individuals think that events like the Olympics and sporting events are crucial for improving national cohesion and relations between nations. This essay will go over the reasons why international sporting events are so important for fostering relationships between nations.

First of all, empathetic environments are created through sports like football, cricket, boxing, and many more. This indicates that there will be six to seven nations participating in a particular game, but only one will be crowned the champion. Failure fosters a type of camaraderie among the losing squad. Consider the World Cup match of cricket, contested by various nations but only between two representatives in the final. All the participating nations enjoy the game despite their disappointment at losing. As a result, these occurrences eliminate the current sense of nationalism and enhance their relationship.

Second, wealthy nations organize these well-known games to display their wealth and status in front of a crowd. These sporting events are organized in stadiums by nations that want to welcome fans and participants from all over the world to showcase their cultures and the natural splendour of their countries. However, many people question whether this is the only justification for taking on such a heavy financial burden. For instance, new research confirms that sponsoring major events in their country raises their stature internationally and enhances their reputation. As a result, the organizers think that the audience will be interested in seeing the nation’s resources and abilities are shown.

In conclusion, well-known occasions like the Football World Cup and other sports enhance the relationship by putting an end to persistent issues or war and fostering world peace. I concur with the assertion made and feel that these events need top importance.

Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Sample Solution

Innovation is born from creativity. As a result, many creative people choose to communicate their ideas and experiences to an audience through the use of words, images, music, or films. Different societies have strong opinions on whether or not the government should control the work of artists. However, I personally think that there shouldn’t be any government meddling so that creators can make the best entertainment without worrying about restrictions.

The main argument in favour of the aforementioned claim is that it enables idea creators to think outside the box and unconventionally. In other words, it encourages creativity, which is vital for a thriving society. As an example, movies used to be large of the same genre in the past. Users used to watch it despite the fact that it was subpar because there weren’t many other options. The development of censorship-free internet streaming services like Amazon Prime and Netflix has increased the amount of humour, crime, and action-related content available, allowing customers to select what they want to watch.

Furthermore, because the criteria are arbitrary, it is challenging to define them. Authorities occasionally only act in response to criticism. For instance, because an Amazon Prime movie criticized how the government handled the outbreak, officials in India demanded the filmmakers cut some inflammatory sequences from it. Therefore, there shouldn’t be any control in order to educate the government and the populace about the true problems.

Finally, because it will give them the opportunity to be imaginative and push their boundaries, I lean toward supporting the independence of artists to create ideas as they see fit. Additionally, it will enable the unrestricted flow of authenticated content. Because people will be more aware of the genuine problems, the government will be compelled to strive for the welfare of its population.

The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years. Many of the problems young people now experience, such as juvenile delinquency, arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Sample Solution

In the past few decades, the position of women in society has changed remarkably. Although many women have joined the workforce, some people believe that it has resulted in problems such as juvenile delinquency because they are not able to take care of their children at home. However, in my opinion, this perspective is not entirely true.

To begin with, there is no denying that women have come a long way in achieving gender equality in society. They have broken stereotypes and overcome many problems to become well-known in different fields. The number of working mothers has increased in recent years, proving to be an asset to the economy. Also, women’s financial independence has allowed them to give their families a better life, and households with two incomes are becoming more common.

Despite this, some people believe that working mothers cannot give sufficient time and attention to their children, which can lead to delinquent behaviour. However, this belief is not entirely true. Firstly, it is not just mothers who raise children. Fathers, grandparents, and other relatives can also provide care and support. Moreover, the availability of daycare centres and after-school programs can ensure that children are in safe and nurturing environments while their parents are at work.

Furthermore, many studies have shown that maternal employment does not necessarily lead to delinquent behaviour in children. In fact, it can positively impact a child’s development. For instance, children of working mothers are more likely to be independent, self-reliant, and have a better understanding of gender equality.

In conclusion, the changing position of women in society has not resulted in the problems of juvenile delinquency. While working mothers cannot be present at home all the time, the availability of support systems and their positive impact on children’s development proves that the concept of the traditional stay-at-home mother is outdated. It’s time to recognize that women’s contributions to society and the workplace are important, and they should be able to work without being judged or blamed for problems in society.

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Sample Solution

The question of whether or not the government should increase its spending on railroads seems irrelevant. In my opinion, it is highly valuable to invest public money in this transit infrastructure.

One of the main justifications for giving funds to railroads is that they are better than roadways. They offer a quicker and more convenient way because they are less impacted by the weather. To put it another way, it is more convenient to travel every day rather than deal with traffic congestion brought on by the mass production of vehicles. Because driving on a busy road can make people anxious and irritable. They will be more focused and productive at work, though, if there are alternative modes of transportation available. Even though roads helped shape many urban regions by paving the way for infrastructure and providing access for moving and delivering commodities, eventually, with the arrival of the industrial period, many employers would gain from the set schedules due to the mass production of automobiles.

On the other hand, spending public money on the railroads would result in more advantages for both society and the general populace. Trains are more productive and cost-effective, for one thing. People would be able to reach their destination on time and operate more effectively. increasing the government’s ability to succeed economically. The environmental friendliness of train routes is another factor. This form of transportation doesn’t use non-renewable resources like fossil fuels. In contrast to vehicles, which might be unhealthy, trains do not produce exhaust gases. Because they contribute to the preservation of the environment, the protection of human health, and increased workplace productivity, rail systems are superior to highways.

In conclusion, government investment in railroad construction can result in additional advantages including environmental protection, increased human welfare, and expansion of the national economy.

Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example, working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood, or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample Solution

Nowadays, people provide free services while educational programs are run to verify working for a charity. What is the best way to cope with organizing events without accepting payment? I agree to back up my points with examples in this essay.

To start with, a group of people is disseminating information to benefit society. Two benefits of communication and self-assurance in moving other behaviors to understand anywhere. For instance, there are several old-age homes in my nation that require assistance without charge. A large corporation gives a charity a significant check or amount of cash. Additionally, the service is mostly offered in daily life due to the continuation of many programs in secondary schools.

Second, it’s necessary for community services to become mandatory with the payment of various clients for a paid job. In different countries, some of the highest-paid work is outside of a cultural context. For example, making the neighborhood a better place for younger kids depends on their current circumstances. The youth are willing to attend cinema-style entertainment since they desire more money to experience life’s events. A growing number of relatives are making sports instruction for adolescents a requirement for their schooling. Many students begin working in juvenile facilities when they are 18 years old, where they are often in dire need.

In essence, despite the widespread misconception that secondary school programs do not pay for services, I think self-respect and assurance are important for a charity. I believe that people in the neighborhood are interacting more with young people.

In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Sample Solution

It cannot be denied that modern society depends heavily on technological innovation. This is the rationale behind why many individuals choose to read all media online for free rather than on paper. I support the concept from a personal standpoint for a variety of reasons, which are discussed in the following essay.

In the future, people will primarily opt to read online newspapers or ebooks because it will be more comfortable for them. In other words, readers can access online publications whenever they want. Moreover, using electronic books will help pupils avoid health issues. In Thailand, for instance, children are required to study seven subjects every day. Students carrying all of their textbooks to school each day risk developing back and arm problems. Furthermore, reading electronic books is preferable to reading printed ones for education. Many types of electronic books are composed of animations, which are simpler to understand.

People will also have additional options for reading newspapers and other publications. To give an example, people can use the internet to obtain daily news and a variety of online literature from both domestic and foreign sources. Additionally, reading electronic books and online news is another approach to protecting the planet from global warming. In other words, if most people prefer reading publications online, it will lessen the amount of deforestation that occurs during the production of books.

To sum up, I firmly believe that, in the future, the vast majority of people will not spend their money on printed newspapers and books because they can get so many benefits from online media.

Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent.

Sample Solution

Some claim that children should be taught parenting techniques in schools. I disagree with this notion, though, as I believe it could divert them from their academic work. An improved ability to communicate and a thorough understanding of a child’s behaviour are necessary for being a good parent.

First of all, learning about parenting is not crucial at the school level. It may distract students from their primary academics. Instead of paying attention to the fundamental, core subjects, students may become distracted by the understanding of intricate parenting techniques. Students’ academic performance will suffer as a result. Instead of teaching this crucial aspect of life in schools, parents should use their own parenting as an example to teach children about the challenges of being a father or mother.

Additionally, there are several crucial abilities that are prerequisites for being a good parent. In order to be a good parent, one must first have effective communication skills. This will improve interactions with the kids and make room for unrestricted conversation between parents and kids. For instance, the lack of communication between parents and children will make it necessary for the kids to conceal their flaws from their parents. Second, parents need to be able to comprehend their child’s concerns and behaviours. In other words, parents should be able to identify the root causes of a child’s issues. For instance, if a child is afraid to attend school, parents should look into and try to understand the causes of this behaviour, whether they are related to social or academic concerns.

In conclusion, rather than teaching parenting in schools, which may have a negative impact on students’ academic achievement, parents might be a helpful resource for children to learn parenting. Additionally, enhanced communication and a clearer knowledge of a child’s issue can help parents to be successful parents.

Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children.
Do you agree or disagree?

Sample Solution

Being around electronic devices too frequently is seen to be more detrimental to young children than beneficial. This essay concurs with the aforementioned claim that spending all day in front of a screen is more harmful to young people than helpful.

It’s possible that a computer really is incredibly useful for getting things done because it saves so much time and effort. However, when used excessively, it causes more harm than good. Children lose the potential to acquire social skills when they use gadgets more frequently than is advised, which is one of the drawbacks. For instance, kids who play with devices all day are probably not going to get out much, which means they are only going to interact with people online or through text messages, which is going to impair their social skills.

Additionally, too much screen time may harm children’s health in most body parts, especially their eyes. The eyes will gradually become damaged from the radiation exposure and lose their ability to perform as they once did. For instance, young people who spend a lot of time using laptops are more likely to need glasses since their vision has been affected and they are unable to see effectively.

In conclusion, I agree that teenagers should not be allowed to use electronics on a regular basis because such behaviors are bad for their health and impair their capacity to interact with others in real life, rather than only online.