Agree Disagree Essays

In agree or disagree essay type, students are supposed to state and argue whether they agree or disagree with the given facts or statement.

  • Is It pointless to keep traditional skills alive?

    When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try to keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

    Sample Solution

    Nowadays, a country’s traditional abilities and ways of life are significantly impacted by technological innovation and its quick global spread. Some claim that such an influence would render standard skills and lives obsolete since it is so remarkable. However, I think they would persist as long as they offered fresh ideas for contemporary technologies and alternatives to contemporary lifestyles.

    One factor is that conventional practices have lost their relevance and don’t meet modern requirements. For instance, traditional practises like being married at the age of 15 and having your teeth dyed black was once common in Vietnam’s mountainous regions, but these practises have since been abandoned and are now meaningless. Additionally, as homes on stilts are not as durable as concrete homes, homes in the mountains are gradually being replaced with concrete homes. Furthermore, conventional skills cannot enhance the image because we now promote the modern 4.0 image, which is quick and convenient rather than cumbersome and slow as in the past. For instance, abilities like ploughing and harrowing are no longer appropriate for international dissemination to enhance the national image.

    Traditional skills also impact work productivity, which gradually loses its value. For instance, instead of harvesting rice by hand in the fields, people now use modern harvesting equipment, which is more time-consuming and does not produce the desired yield. Traditional techniques also fall short of modern technologies in terms of speed and accuracy. For instance, educational software on computers will be used instead of handwriting in order to track the number of students and manage them effectively.

    To sum up, traditional knowledge and ways of living are increasingly being seen as valuable alternatives to the homogeneity that comes with the widespread use of contemporary technologies. Although certain technologies would eventually become outdated as a result of the selection process involved in technological advancement, there is no doubt that some would thrive when their responsibilities were recognized.

  • Are International Sports Events Essential? – Sample Essay

    Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential for easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

    Sample IELTS Essay on Sports Events

    Global sporting events draw participants from various nations, allowing them to showcase their abilities. Many individuals think that events like the Olympics and sporting events are crucial for improving national cohesion and relations between nations. This essay will go over the reasons why international sporting events are so important for fostering relationships between nations.

    First of all, empathetic environments are created through sports like football, cricket, boxing, and many more. This indicates that there will be six to seven nations participating in a particular game, but only one will be crowned the champion. Failure fosters a type of camaraderie among the losing squad. Consider the World Cup match of cricket, which is contested by various nations but is only between two representatives in the final. All the participating nations enjoy the game despite their disappointment at losing. As a result, these occurrences eliminate the current sense of nationalism and enhance their relationship.

    Second, wealthy nations organize these well-known games to display their wealth and status in front of a crowd. These sporting events are organized in stadiums by nations that want to welcome fans and participants from all over the world in order to showcase their cultures and the natural splendor of their countries. However, many people question whether this is the only justification for taking on such a heavy financial burden. For instance, new research confirms that sponsoring major events in their country raises their stature internationally and enhances their reputation. As a result, the organizers think that the audience will be interested in seeing the nation’s resources and abilities shown.

    In conclusion, well-known occasions like the Football World Cup and other sports enhance the relationship by putting an end to persistent issues or war and fostering world peace. I concur with the assertion made and feel that these events need top importance.

  • Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express

    Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

    Sample Solution

    Innovation is born from creativity. As a result, many creative people choose to communicate their ideas and experiences to an audience through the use of words, images, music, or films. Different societies have strong opinions on whether or not the government should control the work of artists. However, I personally think that there shouldn’t be any government meddling so that creators can make the best entertainment without worrying about restrictions.

    The main argument in favour of the aforementioned claim is that it enables idea creators to think outside the box and unconventionally. In other words, it encourages creativity, which is vital for a thriving society. As an example, movies used to be large of the same genre in the past. Users used to watch it despite the fact that it was subpar because there weren’t many other options. The development of censorship-free internet streaming services like Amazon Prime and Netflix has increased the amount of humour, crime, and action-related content available, allowing customers to select what they want to watch.

    Furthermore, because the criteria are arbitrary, it is challenging to define them. Authorities occasionally only act in response to criticism. For instance, because an Amazon Prime movie criticized how the government handled the outbreak, officials in India demanded the filmmakers cut some inflammatory sequences from it. Therefore, there shouldn’t be any control in order to educate the government and the populace about the true problems.

    Finally, because it will give them the opportunity to be imaginative and push their boundaries, I lean toward supporting the independence of artists to create ideas as they see fit. Additionally, it will enable the unrestricted flow of authenticated content. Because people will be more aware of the genuine problems, the government will be compelled to strive for the welfare of its population.

  • Role of neglecting mothers in juvenile delinquency.

    Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:

    The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years. Many of the problems young people now experience, such as juvenile delinquency, arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

    Sample Solution

    Juvenile offenses have significantly increased in recent years. Some of them blame working mothers who struggle to educate their children since they are employed and unable to spend a lot of time with their sons or daughters. I reject this idea because it does nothing to advance the cause of working women as a whole. When I see working women straying from their parental duties, I do, however, have some reservations.

    First off, especially in the recent two decades, there has been significant growth in women’s education and subsequent work. Because of the government’s liberal policies and the effects of globalization, every family’s economic situation has improved. Given the spiraling costs of education, there is no room for doubt when women are actively involved in contributing to their children’s education. Additionally, everyone wants to enroll their kids in the best possible school. They had to put in a lot of effort while keeping the child’s future in mind. The majority of working women’s schedules are consumed by their jobs, but they spend less time with their children. Therefore, without the supervision of their mothers or other responsible adults, children adopt bad habits and make terrible friends, which makes them shoplifters or other small-time criminals.

    However, it becomes clear from analyzing the behavior of petty criminals that not all of their mothers are employed. This demonstrates that we cannot place the blame for encouraging such despicable habits in their children just on the working women’s group. Furthermore, according to a number of child psychologists, a child’s environment might influence how their mentality develops. If a child is left alone, he or she will undoubtedly start looking for a companion or turn to virtual buddies online to help them get over their loneliness. Such behavior serves as a precursor to the subsequent horrible deeds.

    In conclusion, it is absurd to hold working women responsible if their children veer off course and go in a different direction. The issue must be avoided by closely observing the child’s friend group because it negatively affects his behavior and activity. The child requires mental health help if his attitude even appears slightly strange. But a child’s loneliness is what first draws them to these behaviors. They must therefore be supervised, for whatever reason. Will that accomplish its goals?

  • Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads

    Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

    Sample Solution

    The question of whether or not the government should increase its spending on railroads seems irrelevant. In my opinion, it is highly valuable to invest public money in this transit infrastructure.

    One of the main justifications for giving funds to railroads is that they are better than roadways. They offer a quicker and more convenient way because they are less impacted by the weather. To put it another way, it is more convenient to travel every day rather than deal with traffic congestion brought on by the mass production of vehicles. Because driving on a busy road can make people anxious and irritable. They will be more focused and productive at work, though, if there are alternative modes of transportation available. Even though roads helped shape many urban regions by paving the way for infrastructure and providing access for moving and delivering commodities, eventually, with the arrival of the industrial period, many employers would gain from the set schedules due to the mass production of automobiles.

    On the other hand, spending public money on the railroads would result in more advantages for both society and the general populace. Trains are more productive and cost-effective, for one thing. People would be able to reach their destination on time and operate more effectively. increasing the government’s ability to succeed economically. The environmental friendliness of train routes is another factor. This form of transportation doesn’t use non-renewable resources like fossil fuels. In contrast to vehicles, which might be unhealthy, trains do not produce exhaust gases. Because they contribute to the preservation of the environment, the protection of human health, and increased workplace productivity, rail systems are superior to highways.

    In conclusion, government investment in railroad construction can result in additional advantages including environmental protection, increased human welfare, and expansion of the national economy.

Back to top button