Advantages of spending on disease prevention than on treatments.
“Prevention is better than cure.” Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sample Solution
Some government health budgets are said to be better spent on raising public awareness than on treating diseases. In other words, if the locals had the knowledge to avoid getting sick, they wouldn’t have to undergo treatment for ignorance. I believe that instead of enhancing treatment strategies, ministries should concentrate on educating people and promoting preventative measures.
First off, despite the fact that certain administrators consider that hospitals and medical facilities should be improved, they frequently spend more money expanding their understanding in this area. For instance, as the Covid-19 virus has spread, governments have looked into several therapeutic stances to halt the epidemic. There is no proof, though, that it will be stopped in the future. They have therefore invested a sizable sum of money in trying to discover a solution.
On the other hand, some people claim that societies would not need to advance the medical business if sanitary lessons were fully taught in schools and made students aware of the repercussions. For instance, if people had been taught about sanitation concepts like social distance from the very beginning, the world would not have had pandemics, to use the example of COVID-19. Therefore, understanding how to avoid being sick is essential.
To sum up, while governments devote a significant percentage of their budgets to healthcare, others argue that it would be wiser to use that money to raise individual knowledge in order to avoid being sick in the first place. Additionally, I would unquestionably support the philosophy of prevention, which defeats hazy treatment options given that there is no assurance that any given therapy approach will be effective.