Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
There are differing views on whether extremely useful information related to research, marketing, and education should be offered for free or charged. While others contend that such priceless discoveries should be made freely available, I think that depending on the circumstances, there may be a need to impose certain fees before access. This essay will thoroughly examine both points of view before drawing a reasonable verdict.
On the one hand, having unrestricted access to knowledge, especially about recent and historical events, provides empowerment. The general public is better equipped to make their own decisions as a result of exposure to the most recent techniques made available through the communication of breakthroughs in numerous fields. For instance, the governments of many nations were able to successfully advise the populace on the value of avoiding close contact, maintaining good personal cleanliness, and using face masks. COVID-19, a highly contagious disease that wracked the world a few years ago, was thus able to be contained. The free flow of pertinent intelligence throughout society across all boundaries is therefore essential.
Sharing useful information has the aforementioned advantages, but not all kinds of information should be freely accessible to everyone for the reasons listed below. First of all, the researcher puts in a lot of effort and deserves to be acknowledged for his commitment. For instance, a lot of pharmaceutical businesses invest a lot of time and money into trying to find a solution for a disease. Therefore, the company will eventually close since it cannot maintain itself when the medicine is made available without any payment to the creators. In addition, academic staff members should be compensated for continuously imparting worthwhile knowledge to students.
Although debate rages on whether good information should be provided for free or at a cost, let’s conclude. I believe that it depends on the circumstances because, in certain cases, information about health concerns can be freely distributed while, in others, it may be commercialized.