It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often debated whether humans should intervene to prevent animal species from becoming extinct. Some argue that extinction is a natural process that has occurred throughout history and should not be prevented, while others believe that it is the responsibility of humans to protect endangered species.
Those who believe that humans should not prevent extinction argue that it is a natural process and part of the cycle of life. They suggest that species become extinct due to natural selection, which ensures the survival of the fittest. They also argue that some species are not meant to survive forever and that humans should not interfere with the natural order of things.
On the other hand, those who believe that humans should intervene to prevent extinction argue that we have a moral responsibility to protect other species. They argue that human activities such as habitat destruction, climate change, and poaching are major factors contributing to extinction and that humans must take responsibility for their actions. They also suggest that many species provide important ecological benefits and that their extinction could lead to devastating consequences.
In conclusion, while some may argue that extinction is a natural process that should not be prevented, it is important for humans to recognize their role in contributing to extinction and to take responsibility for protecting endangered species. By doing so, we can ensure that these species continue to play a vital role in our ecosystems and that we maintain biodiversity for future generations.