Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
Many museums charge for admission, while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Everyone enjoys going to museums to learn about a broad range of topics, but mostly to learn about the past. Many museums have admission fees, while others are totally free. I’ll discuss the advantages and disadvantages of charging museum visitors an entrance fee in this article and attempt to reach some conclusions.
To begin with, not many museums have the funds to charge visitors to view their displays of scientific equipment. Additionally, they wish to keep the equipment in good working order because many people visit the nearby museums. For instance, aquariums require a lot of income to properly manage their fish tanks because different varieties of fish are present and need to be cared for. Therefore, paying admission fees and touring the area aids the staff in maintaining the facility.
On the other hand, historical and artistic structures are free to visitors because they want them to understand and learn important things about their past. Additionally, this encourages people to attend these locations more regularly instead of going to a bar or a restaurant. For instance, museums dedicated to plants and animals are free because they want to educate the next generation. Thus, this kind of setting benefits artists in an indirect manner because they gain recognition when they showcase their abilities at these sorts of institutions.
In conclusion, entrance to the museum ought to be paid for. In fact, I think residents are more likely to mess with the property than take adequate care of it.